It's concerning that people place blame on the girl. She was not posing an imminent threat to anyone and thus legally and morally there was no right to attack her like he did, end of story.
There's no argument you can make that will contradict that. The false equivalencies only serve to show the fundamental lack of basic understanding many of you have, legal authority is supposed to respond with force proportional to the risk the offender faces to the authority and the public. Since she posed none there was no justification, legally, for him to respond as he did. A police chase where civilians are in danger is 100% the polar opposite of someone sitting silently.
|