View Single Post
Old 10-25-2015, 09:43 AM   #577
zzibradleyizz
Backup Goalie
 
zzibradleyizz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default The Home Improvement Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wormius View Post
I have these leaking valves for my front and backyard faucets. For about a month after I turn the water off, if I don't set the knobs in exactly the right position they leak and leak. I am going to replace them, but wondering about whether I really need separate shut offs for the front and back faucets? Is there generally a good reason to have both? If there was a problem I think turning both off with one valve would be okay. I can't see turning the reason for controlling them separately. Is there something I am missing?

If I was replacing them I would replace them with a Sillcock (Non-Free Hose Bibb) then have one ball valve with a bleeder at the take off near your master shutoff valve/water meter. The bleeder is not essentially needed for winterizing, but is there if you ever needed it for drain down. This way you don't need to drain down the lines in the fall. Just disconnect your exterior hoses connected to the hose bibs and voila you're done. You don't even need to shut the ball valve off inside this way. But it doesn't accomplish what Ducay suggested about one being out of commission under repair and you need to use the other one as you'll have the valve shut off to do the repair. But you can turn just one on for quick use if needed and it doesn't effect the other.

In terms of having a shut off valve for each line, keep in mind that if you have a finished basement or planning to down the line with a drywall ceiling, you need access to these valves and sometimes there not in the best or most appealing spot for looks. Just something to think about.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Last edited by zzibradleyizz; 10-25-2015 at 09:51 AM.
zzibradleyizz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to zzibradleyizz For This Useful Post: