View Single Post
Old 10-21-2015, 11:48 PM   #437
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by accord1999 View Post
Uber is a great deal for passengers, but since you're considering being a driver have you looked at the calculation from that side?

With a fare of $22, that's about 20 km. That also means out of that fare, the driver got ($22-$1.85 SRF)*0.8 = $16.12. If we use the CRA allowance rate of 49c/km then the cost of driving 20 km is $9.80 leaving a net gain for the driver of $6.32. If the driver has an older fuel-efficient vehicle the costs are probably lower, let's say 30c/km. That results in a net gain of $10.12 for the trip.

However, this ignores all of the unpaid km driven to get to passengers. An optimistic ratio is 2 paid:1 unpaid. In this case, the net gain drops to $1.42 for operating costs of 49c/km and $7.12 for operating costs of 30c/km.

Finally, the current Calgary rate is high compared to Edmonton and Toronto where it's 85c/km. If it drops to match that rate (which almost always happens), then the driver with a higher operating cost vehicle will likely lose money on the trip or eek out a $4-$5 profit with the cheaper vehicle..


You wouldnt do that.

Thats the (very old) rate for corporate reimbursement not deduction.

I mean, it makes your calculation nice and simple, but it isnt how its done, or at least not how it should be done.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans

If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
Locke is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Locke For This Useful Post: