Quote:
Originally Posted by HockeyIlliterate
Yes, slightly higher.
Actually, my hypo involved a $201K salary.
I thought that your first reference to $210K was just a typo, but if you really want to use that number, so be it.
Regardless, as evidenced by what I consider to be "slightly higher," aren't most debates and discussions regarding tax matters and what is fair or appropriate all relative to one's amount of current income or wealth?
|
Yes, but I'd rather have 1 or 2% of folks spending less to stimulate the economy and 98% spending more. Fact is, that top 1-2% would spend it on less stimulating things, like savings and investments. Direct consumption will always trump that