Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunk
But if the City is requesting certain information to enable that change and the proponent does not, what are they supposed to do?
It's like if I as a developer was trying to build something using an equivalency to the meet fire code provisions in a new way because I believe the existing fire code provision is onerous. The City says OK, show us how that works. And I say no, and then build the building anyway.
I agree taxi reform has been too slow, but at least in recent years some tangible steps have been taken. That hadn't been the case in a generation.
|
You're not going to win this argument Bunk. The taxi industry has been so bad for so long with so many politicians in their pockets that it doesn't matter what points you make, Nenshi is the bad guy in this. And whether you agree or not, the public is better served by Uber starting now than waiting for whatever appeasements the city wants out of them