View Single Post
Old 10-16-2015, 07:57 AM   #230
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed View Post
If it were that simple, I don't there would be much issue. Uber has no intention of getting their dress t have that.

But if the city had a reasonable policy then über could choose to enter or not and enforcement would be reasonable.

Instead über to get laws change which allow that business model to exist they need to fight politicians who have been bought by can companies.

The city has completely failed to adapt to modern technology and provide options to what is clearly a failed system. So you get where you are today.

If uber can't meet reasonable requirements then they shouldn't be here. But right now there are no reasonable requirements to meet so uber becomes the good guys trying to drive change.

This entire issue is on the city for failing to provide a reasonable regulatory framework for which companies can operate in.

It sounds like the risk is now on the driver rather than the public so I'd be okay taking an uber right now. Just make sure you have uninsured motorists protection on your personal policy.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote