Quote:
Originally Posted by Conroy4Mayor
My exact point is that no-one's foresight is perfect. We all watch the same hockey games and yet still have have differences of opinion. I get it that some of you like Bollig. I just happen to like other players better.
I think it is healthy having people argue against an overabundance of truculence. I think Burke has a very strong opinion on the matter, that other people in the organization are hesitant to challenge. Feaster wasn't perfect, but I bet he argued for skill (and tangible results) over truculence (and immeasurables).
|
Why does it have to be one or the other? Seems to me that Hartley and Treliving are trying to find a good balance of both.