Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
Absolute statement? Sure it is, it has to be. Everything between the two statistically and career wise says so. Hiller is better than Ramo, always has been, thats a fact. No way around it.
|
I'll suggest that Bob Hartley disagrees its as clear-cut as you contend. And to a lesser extent Brad Treliving, who saw fit to re-sign Ramo (although, as Bingo noted, we can only speculate as to the reasons why).
And I'll concede Hiller was lights out during the Anaheim glory years, but comparing his work last year to Ramo's work in the last year and a half, and trying to project that to 2015/16, I think it's closer than the stats might suggest.