Quote:
Originally Posted by Meers
Of course the victim, doesn't need the evidence bag.
But Kane needs it to be tampered with, so that all physical and DNA evidence against him will be thrown out. Now, who better to pin the tampering on than the victim? It couldn't be a more perfect set-up.
Also, by having the evidence left at the victim's house, it sends her a blunt and powerful message that the entire legal system and the police are against her.
(Which of course they are.)
This whole case is just textbook.
|
Wow, so you think Kane or his team tampered with the evidence? Bizarre conclusions, to say the least.
From what we know now, it seems much more plausible that the accused mom may be implicated in the "discovery" of the bag. The accused lawyer was lied to, he has discovered this falsehood and must resign due to ethical considerations. The lawyer arguably should have handled it differently from the start, but him stepping down for these reasons is absolutely necessary. No payoff conspiracy required.