Quote:
Originally Posted by T@T
|
I am not computer savvy enough to post youtube stuff, but maybe you could post the comments by Kane's attorney from 45 minutes after this press conference. Basically saying that if the "evidence" was tampered with after the original testing then they have been denied the right to examine the evidence. He then reiterated that Kane had nothing to do with the accused rape and now they can't confirm the evidence. As they just discussed on 960 theFan, there are 2 possible scenario's, 1 - the evidence didn't show what the accuser wanted (or someone from the lab wanted) so they send the envelope to discredit the testing by saying it was tampered with, or 2 - the evidence was tampered with before the testing (big reach on this one) and this confirms what Kane's lawyer said about them not having the legal right to confirm the testing.
Tough case for the courts to figure out.