Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
This isn't like killing someone for money. They way you describe it it's a planned decision to sleep with Kane and then blackmail him with a phony rape allegation.
She has to first manage to sleep with Kane.
Then, to pull off a money grab, which she can't assume will just be settled over night, she has to decide to lie about it; make sure it's a he said she said situation; tell no one of her plan, before or after; decide to risk lying to the police (a criminal offence); put herself in the public eye and risk being trashed; expose herself to questioning by the cops, the prosecutor and ultimately cross-examination by a top defence lawyer; go hire a civil litigator herself and sue in civil court for money, all under the public eye, and subject to even greater cross-examination than in a criminal case (since the scope will be greater). Then she might lose.
Unless she's nuts (the only actual false rape case against a celebrity I know of was because of psychosis, not money), that's a lot of work and criminal risk for a very uncertain payday. Hence, far fetched.
|
Or she sleeps with Kane, regrets it and see's an opportunity. Maybe Kane slighted her in some way? You have no knowledge of the situation. You're just believing the accuser because she's claiming rape and has vagina. That's it. That's all you're going off of.
You can't write off either option here. Just cause someone accuses someone of something does not make it true.