[longsuffering]

Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague

Anyway, just to type out my thoughts somewhere so I can crystallize them, this thread seems to be a reasonable place.

Trudeau: I really dislike this guy.

Mulcair: Way less of the "creepy" factor than in the first debate, though it started to come back towards the end.

Harper: Someone above said "Harper was Harper", which about sums it up. Generally what he says strikes me as reasonable, even if cast in a favourable light for his party, and the criticisms of his opponents also struck me as generally fair.

I would say for me, of the three, Trudeau performed the worst but on an economy-based debate he may still have exceeded expectations relative to the other two and won on handicap. No earth-shaking moves will result from this, in my estimation.

Originally Posted by Daradon

Thanks for the synopsis CHL. Some interesting points and ideas in there.

Do you hyper-partisan CPC supporters really believe anyone buys into your 'impartial and unbiased' analysis of the debate?

It's a joke, right?