Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Stonedbirds
So his life is worth protecting with firearms because he's rich and because of public policy he enacted, but the regular Joes life isn't worth that kind of protection?
I thought the general consensus was that firearms make for poor defence?
Pure elitism.
|
No one ever said no guns at all under any circumstances. People just want stricter gun control.
Limiting certain types of fire arms to specially trained and bonded people (like police or highly trained security personnel) isn't anymore elitist that only letting people with driver's licenses drive cars or trained people operate airplanes.