Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss
That is what I meant - that if you had a daughter you'd be much less likely to accuse someone of making up a rape to get money.
I was talking about the posters making the argument - nothing about whether or not Kane is guilty.
|
Really? I mean, I understand the suggestion of having a protective nature, but I also live in the real world and meet countless thousands of people.
Not every woman you meet is sugar and spice and everything nice and not every man is a leering rapist. People are just people.
Realistically there are realistic arguments that can be made on both sides to argue for the guilt or innocence of either party hypothetically but at the moment people are attempting to extrapolate a conclusion based on absolutely no information.