Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames
We'll never know so all we can do is speculate.
But putting myself in Ferly's shoes, as a young prospect with a 30 game NHL resume, and no real stats to write home about (except for the 9 games in the playoffs) I would rather a 2 year deal than a 1 year deal for security.
Putting myself in BT's shoes, I would offer Ferly a 1 year "show me" deal. After he shows you what he can do over 82+ games, then you pay him accordingly.
Thatts why I think Ferly wanted 2 and the Flames wanted 1. Many a player were awesome in their small sample size. Remember Sven? GMs need to be careful not to get swept up in hype of a prospect for the greater good of the club.
|
With expiring contracts, the Flames can't afford to pay Ferland more money next season. In 2 seasons they'll have more money to work with and can pay Ferland what he's worth if he proves more.