Quote:
Originally Posted by polak
Actually the fact that they're both far apart screams to me that there is probably no case against Kane besides the victims word and the fact that they had sex.
You can't be "far apart" unless you believe you're in a position of strength. I don't think you mess with holding out if there is a real threat of jail in your future.
|
Thats one way of interpretate it I guess. It's the first negotiation session. Just exepting the first number thrown out there could scream guilty. He is going to putup a fight either way. She could be asking for more than he is willing to pay whether he is guilty or not. His legal team could be trying to strong arm her into excepting a lower settlement in return for not dragging her through the mud in a trial.
The point I'm trying to make is your interpretation is. Blaming a potential victim when chances are just as likely Kane is being a dirt bag after a possible crime. Without a trial we will never find out the actual truth.