Quote:
Originally Posted by KipperFaNaTic
I don't get all the uproar that happened on the first page. I think this is an absolutely valid thread. Blackhawks may be looking to trade Kane after warning him about his wild behaviour and thus OP is just wondering whether Treliving should bite if he indeed were in fact on the trading block.
|
You answered your own question... the uproar was at the ridiculous notion of Calgary trying to trade for him.
We are going to be tight to the cap moving forward as things sit now... never mind adding a 10 million dollar cap hit.
Then there's the matter of the assets we'd be stripping ourselves of to acquire him (were he indeed available and not charged with a felony).
Then, on top of all of that, there's the fact he's a loose cannon off the ice and clearly of poor character.
The topic of Kane being traded in general isn't ridiculous. The notion of Calgary trading for him is.