I read this article with some interest and mixed emotions. This would be a classic textbook example of role reversal debate and proof by assuming the opposite. Most strict Muslim theocracies that pretty much ban and criminalize other religions (Saudi Arabia, Iran, Pakistan etc.) are established in-time and their screaming lack of religious freedom is not seriously challenged by the international community. Yet, when a predominantly Christian independent country makes a move to ban Islam, the international furor ensues. What's good for the goose?... I would be curious to hear UN's position on this (if they dare to say anything).
Link to the Article in Guardian