Quote:
Originally Posted by Oil Stain
You really miss the point a lot.
I'm the one saying there is no evidence that a new conditioning coach leads to more goals.
You are arguing that its true.
You have everything upside down.  |
Nope, as usual you're more interested in your insecurity than actually looking at what's being said.
Part of the Flames success last year is that they were one of the hardest working teams in the league. This was widely noted and accepted, but because you cheer for a team that was one of the laziest devoid of any semblance of two-way play or effort, you feel the need to lash out citing that the Flames have no advantage in those areas (because those are really foreign concepts to you at the end of the day).
It's really a simple point, but your agenda in what brings you here has you doing what you always do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oil Stain
It appears that if NHL.com wrote an article saying the Flames won the first round of the playoffs last season because Hartley had a magic rock in his pocket, you'd defend that too.
|
This really sums up what you're all about. Sheer and utter nonsense. The NHL did write about Hartley, and it was pertaining to his "Coach of the Year" caliber season... one in which he instilled one of the best work ethics in the league through high tempo practices and a high emphasis on strength and conditioning.
Don't let facts get in the way of your insecurity induced mud slinging though.