If the Kings argument is that he didn't tell them, yet he is only just now getting charged it will be interesting to see how it plays out. Now I don't know the legalities and clauses in the SPC, but from an outsiders view I can't see how Richards not telling the Kings before there was an actual charge is a violation, had he hidden the charge yeah that's a whole different story. Basically if you're under investigation are you forced to tell your employer? What if your investigated and not charged? Is there a precedent for this type of thing?
__________________
 
|