Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
Again, a pretty trivial reason if you ask me. It's not like he's the first and last beneficiary of nepotism.
|
So you have nothing against nepotism and believe that makes a good road for a leader to take? You basically just admitted he's not the best man for the job for Liberal leadership and got it due to nepotism. You know the last example of a leader that was a major beneficiary of nepotism? George W. Bush. How did that turn out? It's not trivial at all as you are just downplaying a valid criticism. I assumed a political genius such as yourself you could to a lot better than skirting around my question.