View Single Post
Old 08-20-2015, 12:34 PM   #23
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV View Post
Tanking in your draft year mean a need to prove people wrong about your shortcomings in your Draft+1 / Draft+2 years if you want to continue to be considered a top 100 prospect at that point in time. That is only fair and it applies to Kylington, he has to show progress in Draft+1 and then Draft+2 not just stagnate.

Examples:
Cam Fowler (made NHL in Draft+1)
Ryan Getzlaf (increased production 57% in Draft+1)
Brandon Saad (increased production 85% in Draft+1)
Filip Forsberg (earned NHL callup in Draft+1, longer callup in Draft+2, was calder candidate in Draft+3)
Anze Kopitar (transitioned well to SEL in Draft+1, High-level NHLer by Draft+2)

Cam Fowler had a great draft year --- he was the 3rd D-man picked. He was projected higher by TSN but #12 pick is not falling to the end of the 2nd round.

Brian Getzlaff was chosen #18 in the 2003 draft... Brent Burns, Corey Perry, Ryan Kesler, Mike richards got picked after him in the 2003 1st round.

Kopitar was chosen #11 overall .... out of a freakin' Swedish Jr. league. In his 5 games for Sovenia at the U20 WJC he had 10 goals and 13 pts as a 17 year old. He was a physical phenom. To say that he he had a bad draft year.... like Kylington is preposterous.


Saad is a story where he looked to have an attitude problem in his draft year that bumped him down to the 2nd round and he straightened out.


For each player that had a "sub-par" draft year and rebounded in the following years there will be 20 guys like Angelo Esposito that had poor draft years and basically that was as good as they got.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote