View Single Post
Old 08-19-2015, 12:25 PM   #1952
Zarley
First Line Centre
 
Zarley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi View Post
Maybe you could explain this further because I don't see it that way.

What costs/risks are CSE bearing in this case?
The Flames borrow $250M upfront for construction.

The organization then is responsible for placing a surcharge on tickets that will support an annual revenue stream to pay back the loan. The risk is that demand for tickets drops and CS&E is forced to lower prices, hurting their bottom line. The risk to the lender is that the teams fold and CS&E goes under.

Financing can be sourced commercially at a low rate because there is a steady dedicated income stream and the organization is well established with a good credit history.

The other alternative is that the City borrows on behalf of CS&E at the Alberta Capital Finance Authority rate and takes a spread on that to account for additional risk.

In either case, it is the Flames organization bearing that cost.
Zarley is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Zarley For This Useful Post: