View Single Post
Old 08-19-2015, 10:11 AM   #1854
Hockeyguy15
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Obviously the the concept drawing was bare-bones. But there was no mention at all by KK the roof would be retractable. Only that it would be translucent. I realize the retractable roof costs more.

What I am suggesting is that given a choice, most people would prefer a retractable roof. Why would you not (besides cost)? If the game is played on a beautiful evening, wouldn't you want a nice breeze? If its freezing and snowing, close the roof.
It's 100% cost related without a doubt. My issue is that I don't think most people think it should be retractable like you are saying. I don't think the cost of the retractable roof outweighs the benefits of it, and I actually attend football games. Not to pick on you but since you are pretty vocal about it how many games do you plan on attending?

Not only that but the field house will 100% of the time have the roof shut, so all we are talking about having a retractable roof for is 11 or so Stamps games. The added cost is not worth it.
Hockeyguy15 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Hockeyguy15 For This Useful Post: