Quote:
Originally Posted by heep223
How do you know that the city is paying for the remediation? or the shortfalls? Or that the city is lending the ticket tax money? KK said that they'll look at commercial financing as well. And again, you're just completely ignoring any benefit the city gets from owning the land and the building and getting a slice of the operating income. That would be inconvenient to your argument.
The infrastructure would have to be upgraded to develop this land at all. Are you a proponent of letting this prime real estate sit there for another 3 decades?
You raise some good points but your reaction is pretty aggressive, given the amount of things that you don't know.
|
Why is it a false dichotomy it isn't, either pay a bunch of money for the Flames or let the land sit for 30 years. There are probably many ideas that could be brought up on what to do with the land, stop making it a one or the other thing.