Quote:
Originally Posted by Frequitude
The city had already budgeted $200M for a fieldhouse. That money will now go towards this and they'll get the same thing but better. I don't see the problem. Unless people didn't want money going to a fieldhouse in the first place.
I am surprised that the Flames didn't throw in a token share of the $330M cost savings due to the shared design. Like, say even just make it $190M so you can tell tax payers this helped save them money vs a previous budget.
|
No they haven't budgeted it. They put it the capital planning.. but they haven't found the moeny for it at all. It's a "future consideration"