Quote:
Originally Posted by The Yen Man
Isn't that a little exaggerated? We're talking about a community of 60K vs. a city of over a million people. That's 0.006%. So I guess in your restaurant example, I don't really care about covering 0.006% of the bill. If we are really that anal about other people using our services for free, shouldn't we be taxing everyone who doesn't have a Calgary address?
Edit: Crap, not good at math, that's 6% more. I guess whatever, point still stands. I don't really care if I have to cover 6% if someone doesn't pay enough at dinner. Me and my buddies always overpay anyways, so I've never encountered your restaurant situation.
|
Sure. Then add Okotoks, Cochrane, High River and Strathmore. Now how much is it?
Still cool with paying for other people? For how long?
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans
If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
|