Quote:
Originally posted by TheCommodoreAfro+Oct 24 2004, 01:28 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (TheCommodoreAfro @ Oct 24 2004, 01:28 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:
Originally posted by Displaced Flames fan@Oct 24 2004, 03:47 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Flame On
|
Quote:
@Oct 24 2004, 06:38 AM
DIS, I know I'm probably not the most popular person with you right now, and honestly it's not my intention to wind up anyone. So I'm sorry if I have (called names and stuff I mean).# I just want to add here though, that even if the perception is that Bush Cheney are tougher on terror, that doesn't mean they'd be more effective against terror than anyone else might be, IMO. I mean we can't know that now can we, who might be more effective in the future or if it isn't going to come to pass (i.e. Kerry doesn't get it)?# I don't want another war with you, so i do concede that it does look from the outset that Bush is tougher :P# # # 
|
No we can't know, and I didn't say that it was impossible for anyone to be tougher.
What I did say, and what can't be refuted is that Bush has a record to run on regarding the issue, and Kerry doesn't.
|
Bush's record is as thus:
He wasn't looking for Bin Laden. Just wasn't worried about him. No context, just that he's done and we don't think he's the heart of any command structure.
He ignored the briefing on imminent terror attacks that crossed his desk a month earlier.
He precided over My Pet Goat in a Florida classroom after he knew the first plane hit the WTC. And continued to read on as the second one crashed into the second tower.
He sent a nominal force into Afghanistan to oust the Taliban (whom he welcomed to Texas as governer of Texas, BTW) and cature Bin Laden. He didn't so....
He invaded Iraq to oust a guy who had nothing to do with the attacks or Al-Queda. He attacked and detained his own citizens without trial. He attacked the constitution by rolling back constitutional freedoms with the patriot attack and attacked those who attack these policies as "traitors of America".
You call it "tough on terror". It's actually really just a whole bunch of misplaced anger and wrong priorities.
But Cheney sure looks tough when he scowls, though. Maybe
that's it. [/b][/quote]
Wasn't looking for him eh?
Whats this then,
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article....RTICLE_ID=41059
Of course we all said that he would turn up before the election.
And i bet you think we should go get him, like Kerry would and get American's slaughtered in the process. Or maybe Kerry would back off his word now since Bin Laden is supposedly located. And sending 130,000 troops into the Afghan isn't going to help because Bin Laden isn't there.