Quote:
Originally posted by Lanny_MacDonald+Oct 23 2004, 06:53 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Lanny_MacDonald @ Oct 23 2004, 06:53 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-sjwalter@Oct 23 2004, 11:17 PM
Hey Lanny what do you think of this?
Out of the Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3.
"No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President ... having previously taken an oath ... to support the Constitution of the United States, [who has] engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof."
What did he really do when he met with the Viet Cong?
|
What do I think? About what? Are you trying to say that Kerry aided and gave comfort to the enemy? If you are, there's nothing to say. It gives me an indication what your understanding of the war was and means there is no reason to discuss this matter with you any longer. You have a predisposition to believing anything that anyone says against Kerry, rather than using the history of the conflict and that of the people lin question to define your own opinion. To me it sounds like you have someone telling you mis-truths (your social studies teacher?) and he's not allowing you to make up your own mind and expanding your understanding of all sides of the issue. That's what I think. [/b][/quote]
Kerry was an anti-war pretester, against America and what they did in the Vietnam War. Then he goes and meets with the Viet Cong at an "undisclosed" location in Paris. Put two and two together and you should see why i brought up the constitution. And if Kerry's record is so flawless why does't he release it to the public? And don't give me the BS that he already did, because he never realeased all of it yet.