Quote:
Originally Posted by OMG!WTF!
|
That website is terrible... conflating sexual harassment with sexual assault, failing to identify context for sexual harassment (presumably in the website's case it's referring to the university itself). Just brutal.
To be clear, this was not sexual harassment, though it may have been sexual assault - whether this counts as "applying force" to the reporter in a manner that violated her sexual integrity. I don't know the case law on what the standard is there (apparently a bunch of contextual factors come into play in determining this).