View Single Post
Old 07-31-2015, 10:29 AM   #642
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
Ok. Share the facts then. Show me the math and let me decide for myself.
Let's use a person with an income of $50,000 as an example with one child. The increase to the UCCB is $720 annually. In Alberta, that person's effective rate is 18.7% - they're paying $9,350 in income tax.

At a rate of 18.7%, you keep $513.36 of the UCCB. The tax credit that is eliminated was worth $337.50.

Final net gain: $175.86

But also consider:

1. The doubling of the fitness expense limit to $1000 is worth $75.
2. If you spend enough in child care expenses ($5000 for a kid aged 7 to 16), that is worth $187.

So you're up at least $175.86, and maybe as much as $437.86, just on those changes.

As your marginal rate increases, the advantage of the UCCB over the old credit shrinks. No one has an effective rate of the full 39%, but if you did, you would be up $101.70 over the old system, not taking into account those other changes I noted above.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno

Last edited by CorsiHockeyLeague; 07-31-2015 at 10:36 AM.
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CorsiHockeyLeague For This Useful Post: