[Flame On]

Thanks for explaining what you meant with the loser holiday stuff.....funny that's the only thing you were able to respond to though, isn't it?

1. they still have a role to do, and report their findings to Bush but still have to serve the US people surely. Otherwise by your standard of Bush control, he could order them to announce they've caught Osama and won the war on terror, they'd have to obey their master wouldn't they?
2. Why wouldn't it be leaked, hmmm. Guess you got me what a solid arguement of unkowns you've put forth. I don't know, perhaps it's not finished quite yet, there are thousands of reasons a report might not be leaked. Perhaps their scared for their jobs with their overlord above them.
3.Maybe that's the leak. Maybe we're seeing the leak, knowing the curious people will dig it out, or shout for it to be released. (fits for point 2 too).
DIS you may not agree, but this is where I talked about your other points, just use your scroll bar.

Originally posted by Flame On@Oct 23 2004, 04:19 AM

Find one single post where I've asked what Bush did 30 years ago. Hell he was probably not even in politics then, why'd I want to know that?

Then why bring it up???? It only aids in confusing the discussion.

I bring up the 30 year issue because I'm sure you'll have noticed (hell I could probably do a search and find contributions from you) threads where Kerry's past comments to the senate are being held against him by the Sinclair group in their controversial documentary. It was argued by a few who hold more right wing opinions that this was fair and good to judge what sort of person he is/was.
I was saying by the same standards, that we should see a current report. What have they got to lose if they've done such a good job? Why not release it if there is one and score more political points? I wonder why, hmmmm.
You then said that I talked about wanting to see Bush's record from thirty years ago which is another falsehood DISPLACED FLAMES FAN....