Quote:
Originally Posted by Oil Stain
I understand it. I just think people that are trying to compare prospects 10-20 deep and saying this team or that team is better are just being obtuse.
The majority of those propsects don't pan out, and no one can really predict which ones do.
So anyone crowing that their team's prospects are unbelievably deep is almost cetainly just being a homer.
|
Yes, because those top five prospects have been the difference in Edmonton turning it around, and the Flames depth has had no impact on the team turning it around. Talk about being obtuse. The proof is right in front of you and you still can't see the obvious. The Oilers had a five year head start on their rebuild and the Flames passed them like they were standing still. What made that possible? Depth.