Quote:
Originally Posted by To Be Quite Honest
There are many reasons for therapy and the only time someone would actually go under this circumstance is threat of job loss. (I'm on my phone right now and it's a pain to text so I hope this is making sense.)
The guy also has a family, I assume, and by firing him outright there is little chance of change and much more for resentment which can be passed on to the children. By offering redemption we can turn this into a positive story. In fact, society will always do better with positive reinforcement over negative.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
|
I get what you're saying, but none of the above is the companies concern. He's caused a stir, he's gone, a company doesn't want to go through the time and expense of rehabilitation of this guy.
Organizations aren't there to change a persons personal outlook, or personal bad habits.
The therapy options are really there to help a person cope with the stresses of the workplace, not act as a therapy for a person that is pretty clearly a idiot.
Its easier, and its cheaper and its a lot less effort for them to just cut ties.
The feel good story of rehabilitating a person means nothing to the company that he works for my friend.
Plus I don't know too many companies that would want to associate with an employee who went on a public racist rant and assaulted a taxi driver. Especially since in this day in age a company really wants to protect their image from that because organizations deal with so many different races and cultures.