Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
Why?
Wouldn't it be easier, and quicker to find someone else to do his job? Instead of suspending him, and having to find someone else to take on the work load, or bringing in a temporary worker and training him. Its not required for the company to take those steps. If he wants to take therapy fine, he can pay for it and do it on his own time, but for every hour that this guy isn't doing his job there's a cost involved.
Its not like therapy is going to change this guys notions in a day or two.
What if the company had a lot of employee's that would be resentful of what he's said?
|
There are many reasons for therapy and the only time someone would actually go under this circumstance is threat of job loss. (I'm on my phone right now and it's a pain to text so I hope this is making sense.)
The guy also has a family, I assume, and by firing him outright there is little chance of change and much more for resentment which can be passed on to the children. By offering redemption we can turn this into a positive story. In fact, society will always do better with positive reinforcement over negative.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk