Quote:
Originally Posted by mikephoen
Agreed. But I also think they are replaceable to a large extent. Bouma can make way for Ferland, who will make way for Smith or another guy in a few years.
I like the Chicago model. Lock up the core and rotate the rest. Ladd was a huge heart and soul guy for them, and they moved him on and didn't miss a beat. They almost for sure should have let Bickell go, but they locked him up and it might have cost them Saad because of it.
Again, I like Bouma a lot, and I agree that you need players like him. I just don't think you have to have him exactly.
I won't be sad if we keep him for a few more years either. But he isn't a core piece that we should be afraid to move on from.
|
Andrew Ladd was a fourth overall pick who was putting up 40-50 points with the Blackhawks. Bickell had a terrific post season and they overpaid because of it. Not great comparisons in my opinion because we aren't going to be paying Bouma 4 million a year. Something around 2 million/year for what he brings is great for the Flames.
You say we need players "like" Bouma except ones who can play in the playoffs without facing injuries. I hate to break it to you, but that sort of player doesn't exist. Bouma randomly broke his hand while blocking a shot. That play doesn't happen and he plays a full season plus playoffs.
Instead of moving him out to make room for Ferland, why not keep both for added depth? That's what strong teams have. Multiple options because injuries happen to every team.
I agree that Bouma isn't part of the "core", but for 2 million I don't see one reason why you wouldn't keep him. Plus Sean needs to keep his room mate right?