Quote:
Originally Posted by Trojan97
I've always wondered this and never asked, perhaps someone here knows. In signings of this nature, why does someone like Bill Arnold make less on his 2way than BVB? Arnold is the more highly rated prospect and I would argue probably means "more" to the franchise having been drafted and brought alone all these years while BVB was a more recent free agent signing. It just seems so random to have one potentially making 50k more than the other when neither have proven anything yet. I see it all the time where a handful of prospects/young players in similar career situations/talent sign and they are generally for differing amounts. Why would unknowns like this not all have the same/similar qualifying offers. Is it just the work of their agent negotiating better deals or what?
Thanks in advance.
|
Without looking any of this up, I would assume bvb's offer was higher because he signed for more on his elc due to being a free agent rather than a drafted prospect like Arnold. Since his initial elc was higher, the minimum raise on his qualifying offer was higher.
I may be out to lunch on this one though.
__________________
These guys come in and it’s always a nice polite one. You serve them because you dont want to cause a scene. And then they become a regular and after awhile they bring a friend. And that dude is cool too.
And THEY bring friends and they stop being cool and then you realize, oh, this is a Nazi bar now. And its too late because they’re entrenched and if you try to kick them out, they cause a PROBLEM. So you have to shut them down.
|