View Single Post
Old 07-14-2015, 10:24 AM   #709
heep223
Could Care Less
 
heep223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era View Post
No, he doesn't need to be the highest paid for the next 4 years. That is ridiculous to suggest. Giordano may be our best player next year, but it is likely that he maintains that stature for much longer. With Gaudreau, Monahan, Brodie, Hamilton and Bennett on the roster it is very likely one of these players surpasses Giodano in short order. You do not pay a player for what he has done, you pay him for what he projects to do. Giordano will be good for likely 3-4 years, then see his talent level fade. You pay for the first three years and understand that he is going to tumble down the lineup after that. Anything more and you strap your team with an ungodly expensive contract playing on the bottom pairing, which is a recipe for disaster.

I still contend that you give Giordano the $9 million he wants in year one, and possibly year two, but after that you have to reduce the amount on his contract by the max allowable to reduce the load at the end. Something like 9, 8.5, 7, 5, 4.5 for a $6.8 hit. I'd give him 3 years of NMC, and 1 year of limited NTC, but the final year being available to anyone in trade. Protects the team in the long run and gives the player what he wants.
Oh yeah totally ridiculous to suggest that our best player is going to be making the most money . Treliving has said that they're creating an internal salary structure with the Brodie and Hamilton deals. Gio is going to be at the top of the heap, as he should be. Monny and Johnny will likely skip the bridge deal and sign long term contracts with a manageable cap hit, and it will be less than Gio's for the next four years.
heep223 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to heep223 For This Useful Post: