Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
Quick summary here:
- One poster posted a study of worldwide trends conducted by NASA
- Another poster quoted said post six months later and asked how it compared to the historical average
- A third poster responds with a pretty basic post about how it was in Calgary
- In between, a bunch of well-written scientific articles are posted and debated, none of which are linked to anything Calgary-specific
- You come in half-cocked and cherry-pick one pretty irrelevant post in an attempt to discredit everything else
That's why you're getting attacked.
|
Yeah sorry but anyone that believe my post deserved being attacked has got their heads way too deep into the climate change cult. You are essentially saying my factual post was attack worthy which shows how deep your commitment is to your cause as you are willing to attack anything that doesn't support it.