Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbob
I think that has a lot to do with Andersson being a safer pick. They probably see the low side as a mid pairing dman or third pairing with offensive upside. Kylington floor is probably a lot lower then that, but his upside is also greater than Andersson. I think they just opted for the safe pick and then when the opportunity came they took that swing for the fences.
|
It is probably as simple as them viewing Andersson as being a better prospect than Kylington. Nothing else to it, they were willing to take the chance that they wouldn't get Kylington at all...