Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire
Are you basing Kulak's and Culkin's NHL readiness based on one practice or do you see something from them last season to make you think that? Kulak spent half the season in the ECHL and Culkin was hurt for half the season. Now you are declaring they're ready for the NHL?
|
It's their progression from 2 years ago to now + watching them almost all year last year. They are looking more NHL ready, the same progression that Spoon made as he moved ahead in his developmental path. What their upside is is still to be determined, but they both look like if they were called upon they would not be a disaster. Last year at this time they were not nearly as composed and efficient defensively. Big strides on their own side of the puck.
That said, more time in Stockton wouldn't hurt, but it would not shock me if either of them made a huge push when it comes time for the preseason.
Here's a list of guys from today that look like if they started in the NHL that they wouldn't embarrass themselves, although there might be some growing pains.
Klimchuk, Jankowski, Poirier, Bennett, Hickey, Kulak, Culkin, Morrison
I would rank the D as follows in terms of closeness with upside being secondary - Morrison - Kulak - Hickey - Culkin (Hickey will likely be the best of the bunch)
With the Flames having a ton of bodies at the NHL level defensively, there is no need to rush any of those guys. It's just good to know that if injuries hit there are quality guys that could fill in competently.