Quote:
Originally Posted by PsYcNeT
I'm not seeing that. I've responded directly to each post directed towards me with my own refutation.
Again, because I'm on the unpopular side of the argument I'm seen as parroting a narrative/agenda, when in reality my point is just concise.
A private entity can control it's own content. The only thing keeping them from exercising control is public opinion/disinterest. Therefore, they are complicit in their content.
|
How do you differentiate reddit form google.
Google allows you to search for whatever you want and profits from it. It does not care if your search allows you to coordinate with other racists etc. It only filters if you tell it to.
Or how do you differentiate reddit from an ISP. Shaw allows you to do whatever you want on the internet and only provides law enforcement with what it's legally obligated to. Shaw profits from the dark side of the internet.
Or how about a phone company. It allows people to converse about whatever they want without any moderation of the content and takes profit from it.
The medium used to have the conversation is not responsible for the message contained within the conversation.