I love guys that run data around, but in this case, the "winner" would be the team that took the guy falling the most every single round, and I've seen in other studies that the opposite is true;
that is, teams that have conviction do better than teams that take the falling stars every round.
I love the Kylington pick, but I won't deny the risk in taking a guy that has fallen that far. Rico Fata was a similar story in 1998. Sometimes there is a big reason not to select a player at any point.
|