Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
and once again, you do absolutely nothing but reiterate your original position as if it is some kind self-reinforcing proof. The fact that you apparently don't watch limbaugh, franken or coulter does nothing to disprove that O'Reilly is just as bad or worse as those listed. I wouldn't defend watching phil donahue by saying I don't watch Keith Olbermann. There's no correlation. I present you with the argument that O'Reilly lacks any form of crediblity, is a known and repeated liar, a plagiarist and unapologetic racist, and you respond with "he's nowhere near the demon that people on the left (and you too I guess) make him out to be." Excellent rebuttal, I'm so glad you're coming 'right at' this discussion.
|
Seems to me I came right at it.
I pointed out that I don't need to defend the guy because I didn't use him as a source of any kind in this or any other discusssion. I can't get any more straight forward than that.
Lanny throws O'Reilly at me, you picked it up and did the same, and now I have to defend the guy? Why? I find him entertaining, but I don't quote the guy in arguments or use him in any way to defend my position on this or any other matter.
So which part of that isn't straight forward?
Beyond that ... I imagine the man's lawyers would have a field day in forcing you to prove ...
+ lacks any form of crediblity
+ is a known and repeated liar
+ a plagiarist
+ unapologetic racist
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
"held a vigil over chomsky". That is so rich. It's akin to your previous statements that he was somehow my (or the 'lefts') hero. Pretty sad tactic, really.
|
If I painted you with an incorrect brush I'm sorry, but were you not one of the two or three guys that spend 6 pages trying to force me to believe this guy is the cat's ass on mideast politics?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
I found the 4000 inflated based on more than 2 things. First, it is not without precedent that a plane crash over water yields survivors. Second, it is not without precedent that transatlantic flights do not often carry the very ceiling amount of the largest capacity airliner in the world. Third, it is not without precedent that every transatlantic flight is not solely on the largest capacity airliner in the world.
|
I don't think any of the three targeted US carriers use anything but large body planes, I could look it up though. Unless you're watching old Aiport movies I don't think the survival rate would be all that high.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
Why is it such a leap in logic that a 10 aircraft, 50 person operation would need to have a bit more organization to pull off a COORDINATED attack than is possible through stand-by ticket purchase, by persons without (real or fake) passports?
|
Who knows ... maybe next time the US and Brits should just stand down and let it happen so they don't get accused of fear mongering!