Quote:
Originally Posted by Phanuthier
What would you be suing them for, specifically?
If its wrongful termination, it has to be something specific according to the US labour laws.
|
Honestly have no idea, specifically. That's why I'd be talking to a lawyer.
But yea, wrongful dismissal sounds right. Not on the grounds that he didn't breach his contract. But that the Kings are using the wording in the contract subjectively. You could probably make the case, based on the fact that Voynov is retained for breaking the same clause, that he was dismissed purely due to his contract status.
I have no idea if that has any legal grounds at all (again, hence the lawyers), but it seems like something like that would have a judge raising their eyebrows.