Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
And if there was a huge earthquake in vancouver, I'm sure more people would be directly affected. Just because you're told something could have happened (4000 people? give me a break), you completely disregard any information to the contrary?
I don't know what I expect from someone who pays attention to 60% of what bill o'reilly says, but I did expect a bit more.
|
Do you honestly think it makes you look more right or educated by consistently taking these things into the mud? We could put it to a vote, but I would think the average guy reading this string would actually deduct points for poor behaviour. Seriously ... it just doesn't add ... let it go.
4000 people ... 10 flights, assuming they are larger planes and at capacity that's not a bad number. Either way it's not my number it's a number I've seen many times in the past two weeks though.
So any person that pays attention to some of what O'Reilly says is deemed not good enough to grab your ear?
The guy has the number one rated cable news show on the air, you might be eliminating a lot of future conversation!
Not sure how an earth quake has anything to do with this discussion, though I'm sure you'd blame that on Bush too if it happened, bottom line a plot was uncovered, arrests were made, and information gleemed before any one got hurt.
In my non politically jaded world that's good news. I guess we all judge "good" differently.