I had a GGG post quoted in which he asked me why Party was moving up my suspicion list.
My answer was that his increase in posts, and the strategic, calculating nature of his posts flagged for me. I don't think I'm as "evidence" based as some of you (as much evidence can be gained from an online forum). I tend more to evaluate based on my gut feelings of the post and whether I think it seems genuine or a lie.
In regards to me saying Pux didn't have a great voting record, but at the time we both were voting for PE - I don't think that's relevant. I was responding to the suggestion that we ALL follow Pux's votes because she's confirmed town. And the idea that if we had two confirmed townies (Pux and GA), we could then follow their lead in votes. Was not in agreement with the strategy because they could make mistakes just as the rest of us have every vote so far.
__________________
comfortably numb
|