View Single Post
Old 06-24-2015, 11:21 PM   #65
Regorium
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoJetsGo View Post
Yea, that's absolute garbage.

The number one thing Gaudreau had going for him is that he made EVERYONE around him better.

The amount of players who had career seasons because of Gaudreau's play speaks for itself. That was far and away the biggest intangible he brought to to the table, and what's going to make him a superstar moving forward.

What a ridiculously poor statement.
Do you not think that Stone did the same thing in Ottawa? Karlsson doesn't win his Norris without Stone. Hoffman does not score as many goals as he did. Turris doesn't hit a career high in points.

Quote:
When we were gameplanning for the Sens in MARCH, many of us assumed Hoffman was the Sens' best rookie. Think about that for a second.
Does this say something about Stone, or something about us as Flames fans?

Quote:
completely agree... Stone was a game away from not even being in consideration as a "rookie"...add another 25 to gaudreau's NHL experience and I'll bet he's way better than stone was.
This is irrelevant. Much like Ekblad being 18.

Last edited by Regorium; 06-24-2015 at 11:24 PM.
Regorium is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Regorium For This Useful Post: