So after reading this debate I get the sense that a true hockey Dynasty at Minimun should have 4 cup championships (consecutive or non-consecutive) in a decade to be considered.
I think I can wrap my head around that, save for the consecutive part. Thats the goal post I'd move for a modern Dynasty. in terms of comprimising with those that feel CHI is NOT a dynasty.
Still, the parity in this league is the closest it has ever been and with the cap what CHI has done is Dynasty worthy. The haven't lost a cup final in this run (3 for 3). But the road to the Finals will never be tougher. And is exponentially tougher than it has ever been in the past.
So I can see the oppositions parameters for a Dynasty and can possibly agree with it later on down the road. But Right now I still think CHI has earned Dynasty status given the added difficulty of getting to 3 cups in 6 years.
|