Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockeyguy15
Well it wouldn't just be a vote.
Day 1 Lego votes Girly, Timbo and I vote activeStick
Day 2 we all vote Girly
Day 3 we all vote you
Day 3 we all vote you
|
This is why I think it's a good scum strategy, you can make a nice small and concise post like this and say scum would never do that. If you were not really paying attention to context, it would be easy to agree. However, I am trying to see past that:
Day 1 - Typically behavior with one or two hosts voting out a townie
Day 2 - Opportunity is seen to get all three of you on a lynch, something that would be unexpected of scum, so you all land on the same person
Day 3 - HG is in a little trouble, so he gets help from his buddies and end up on mrkajz. Once the shift to mrkajz happens, movement to ECF is not required and might raise questions, so all three scum on the same voter again
Day 4 - mrkajz can still be a target. Two of the three scum remain consistent with votes against him, and the Starseed switch-out provides opportunity for one scum to vote elsewhere. All of a sudden the vote is close, so Starseed has to move over to mrkajz to save himself. All three scum end up on the same person
The above context seems pretty reasonable to me. Day 1 and 2 was easy as no one was ever in trouble really, but Day 3 and 4 dictated a bit more dancing to avoid trouble. End result is scum ending up all voting in line, so the follow-up strategy is to say "come on, scum would never do that". It's actually a pretty good plan.